There are a lot of interested eyes focused on the question of
regionalism in Michigan. All of the issues under the broad umbrella of
regionalism deserve our attention as we seek ways to reenergize our
state. If you’re interested in checking out some of the successful
collaborations in local government go to www.SEMCOG.org and click on the joint public services icon. You’ll be amazed at what is already taking place in and around the area.
There are a number of fine examples coming from the business sector
too, including the work currently being done by groups like Detroit
Renaissance in conjunction with local leaders. Detroit Renaissance has
undertaken a regional economic development benchmarking study for
Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties. Part of the effort is to help
identify other regions around the world that metro Detroit could aspire
to emulate. Their researchers have concentrated efforts on big picture
regional strategies like developing the region’s creative capital,
improving the business environment for technology based companies and
investing in vital infrastructure.
I highlight this model not simply on its own merits, but because it
is an excellent example of what true regionalism could ultimately mean
for our state. Instead of pitting city vs. county or township vs.
village over who cuts the grass in medians, regional leaders need to
focus on making this a better place to live, learn and do business for
2007 and beyond.
Regionalism should be as much about vision and strategy as it is
about service delivery. Learning to leverage our collective resources
to improve quality of life is paramount to the region’s future. Linking
Detroit’s cultural center to Hamtramck’s ethnic community and
Northville’s Victorian downtown and Ann Arbor’s college town atmosphere
is all part of the fabric of a successful regional strategy. Others
have figured it out, so can we.